Apple must allow apps from its iOS store to direct users to external payment systems within the next 30 days, a northern California federal judge said this week.
The iPhone giant has emerged virtually unscathed from its ongoing legal war with Epic Games; Apple won nine of ten charges brought against it by Epic, which claimed that iGiant’s rules for in-app payments were anti-competitive.
At the heart of the lawsuit was Epic’s dissatisfaction with having to, along with other app developers, use Apple’s payment systems if their software is to appear in the iOS software store, allowing the iGiant to reduce up to 30% of its sales. . Breaking these rules will result in expulsion from the App Store, which is exactly what happened to Epic.
In the resulting courtroom clash, Epic scored a partial victory on the verge of allowing apps to connect to external payment systems, i.e. not Apple. In September, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction prohibiting Apple from preventing developers from directing their users to third-party purchasing systems through in-app links and buttons.
By using these external vendors, developers could potentially avoid paying fees to Apple. We note that the iTitan may adjust or clarify its App Store fine print to require a cut in outside transactions.
Apple filed a motion to block the court order for a few days while it prepares an appeal, and Judge Rogers dismissed the demand on Tuesday.
Apple’s motion is based on a selective reading of this tribunal’s findings and ignores all of the findings that supported the injunction, namely nascent antitrust conduct, including super-competitive commission rates resulting in extraordinarily operating margins. high and that have not been correlated with the value of his property, âsaid Judge Rogers [PDF].
And so that means that Apple has 90 days to comply with the court order, and since 60 days have already passed, that leaves 30 days, which means Apple has until December 9 to join the program.
âThe court gave Apple 90 days to comply,â Justice Rogers said, âand it still has about 30 days before the injunction takes effect. Thus, the court does not see the need for an additional 10 days for Apple to appeal this decision. Granting that extension would extend the deadline until the end of December just before the December break, which in itself is inconvenient. “
The tech giant told us it will ask a higher court to stay the injunction while it seeks an appeal in the Epic case.
âApple believes that no further business changes should be necessary to take effect until all appeals in this matter are resolved. We intend to request the Ninth Circuit a stay depending on these circumstances, âsaid an Apple spokesperson. The register.
We note that in August, as the world’s smallest peace offer with app makers, Apple agreed to allow developers to send emails or messages to their users “regarding options for” purchasing alternatives â, which was previously prohibited. Â®